| 
[download
in PDF format]
Meeting
Boise Interagency Dispatch Center Conference Room
March 6-8, 2007
Day
One – Tuesday, March 6, 2007
Welcome
& Introductions
- Introductions: The group went around
the table and introduced themselves; new members include
Ray Dampier, the new representative for the Western States
and Robyn Heffernan, the new Chair for the Fire Weather
Committee, Larry VanBussum, representing the Fire Behavior
Committee and the National Weather Service. Eric Christensen
is the new representative from the Fuels Committee.
Attendees: Paul Schlobohm, Tom Wordell, Joe Kennedy,
Pete Lahm, Larry Bradshaw, Wayne Mitchell, Dennis Dupuis,
Robin Heffernan, Ray Dampier, Larry VanBussum and Lani
Williams. Guests: Herb Arnold, Mary Tabor, Mike Barrowcliff,
Kelly Redmond, Greg Jensen, John Noneman, Eric Christensen,
Howard Roose, Jamie Fojtik, John Szymoniak
- Logistics information shared
- Agenda discussed and expectations
established. The Agenda was again organized around the
Strategic Plan. Time has been set aside in the Agenda
for Breakout sessions to work on pending tasks.
Approval of Meeting Notes
The notes from the Athens Meeting as well as the November
and January Conference Calls were approved.
Action Item Review
The Action Item Tracking Table was reviewed and updated.
- Task 48 - in progress; expect that
it will function in the background server this summer.
Models are still being validated.
- Task 49 - Tasked to the Fire Behavior
Committee for endorsement and to develop an implementation
plan.
- Tasks 56, 58 and 72 - The letter will
be finalized at the 2nd Fire Behavior and Fuels Conference
in Destin, Florida to present at the NFAEB April Meeting.
- Tasks 98, 99 and 102 - Letter to FCAMMS
will be finalized at the 2nd Fire Behavior and Fuels Conference
in Destin, Florida.
Strategic Plan Task Review
Actions related to the strategies were reviewed:
Priority 1 – G1S1: Identify and Prioritize existing
and emerging technologies
This topic will be covered after lunch with a presentation
by Mary Tabor.
Priority 2 – G3S1: Utilize an iterative process to
assess user needs, evaluate products, and monitor
This tasks associated with this goal are related to the
work that is being accomplished with OFCM
Paul shared some of the preliminary responses from the OFCM
Survey results that are currently being analyzed. Those
results need to be summarized and returned to OFCM by March
16.
This strategy will also tie into other available surveys.
The NPSG Survey is still undergoing the review process and
is currently not available.
Priority 3 – G2S1: Establish partnership with research
and development
- Action Item: Paul
will contact Eli regarding UCARS and the meeting in Norman,
OK.
Priority 4 – G3S2: Promote spatial database system
that can produce a variety of decision products from core
underlying environmental data (fuels, weather, topography)
(FENWT Priority Strategy 4)
Proactively engage in the Enterprise Architecture efforts
to ensure that FENWT requirements and recommendations for
decision support are addressed.
Paul shared the document and flowchart related to the Core
Blueprint and Enterprise Architecture. This identifies the
framework for interagency wildland fire business with the
intent of creating a virtual single agency for wildland
fire.
Priority 5 – G1S2: Develop a plan to integrate science
into application
Paul has had conversations with Tim Swedberg and John Cissel
at Joint Fire Science Program; this message is consistent
with what they are hearing from other groups as well.
This strategy may need reworded.
Priority 1 – G1S1: Identify and Prioritize existing
and emerging technologies
Task 1a was tasked to Dennis Dupris, which he tasked to
Mary Tabor. She compiled a Fire Environment Software Application
Inventory. In order to accomplish this she made several
assumptions including defining Fire Environment and Software
Application. With this she identified 38 programs. She then
developed a spreadsheet to compare them by type, spatial
scale, supporting training, system requirements, level required
to analyze data as well as a brief description of the application.
As was stated before, there are other groups asking for
the same information. The Pacific Northwest Fire Science
Lap produced a General Technical Report (GTR) which identified
programs as well and the JFSP has awarded a contract to
Carnegie-Melon to address this topic. Any findings in this
area are too dynamic to remain in the printed form; value
to develop a data based that can be queried similar to available
web searches.
- Action
- Mary will send the document out
electronically for review. Reply back in two weeks.
- Mary will contact David Peterson
concerning the future plans for the GTR – if
it is to be made available electronically.
- Read the GTR from the Pacific
Northwest to discuss on the April Conference Call;
including the potential for the information to be
available electronically using a Travelocity/Google
mechanism.
- Think about the JFSP Task and
respond back to Paul in two weeks. Paul will coordinate
with Tim Swedberg.
Priority 3 – G3S4: Provide business oversight and
technical expertise for Fire Environment-related NWCG training
development and deliver
Funding for training/development needs to for through the
Training Working Team; funding was received for workshops
Meeting Cycles and future dates
The driving factor to realign meeting dates is the suggestion
from NWCG that the Working Groups schedule their meetings
at the end of January to coincide with the NWCG Meeting.
This would then impact the Committee Meetings. Paul also
expressed the possibility of virtual meetings and/or transitioning
to a different schedule, expanding the Conference Call holding
shorter meetings more frequently with the use of virtual
meetings.
Decision: Keep current meeting schedule
and explore opportunities for virtual meetings. One meeting
a year will remain in Boise. Consider Ashville, North Carolina
as a possible sight for a future meeting.
Spring Meeting:
June 12-14
Norman, Oklahoma
Agenda - schedule presentations for the morning - three
a day
Tour of the Oklahoma Climate Prediction Center - Larry
Bradshaw will make the contacts.
Oklahoma Mesonet
Storm Prediction Center
Winter Meeting
December 4-6, 2007
Reno, Nevada
2007 Budget
Paul reviewed the 2007 budget. When requesting funding it
is important to keep in mind what the money is going to
be used for and who will be spending it. Committees need
to come forward with projects to submit for funding.
Round Robin:
Eastern States - Joe Kennedy
There was a workshop in Ohio to introduce the crosswalk
for the 13 to 40 Fuel Types, which was well received
Fire Danger Committee - Larry Bradshaw
The Fire Danger Committee met two weeks ago in Salt Lake
City.
FAMWEB will be moving to the new server the first part of
April. All applications that run under FAMWEB will be moved
under a new architecture, which will improve the capabilities
of the data warehouse.
WFIS has a new Lifecycle Plan and the new Project Manager
is Matt Jolley.
NFDRS alternate portal is moving ahead, the Fire Danger
Committee still needs to set up a gate keeping process.
This will allow weather information to be imported from
alternate RAWS stations. Florida and Oklahoma sites will
be considered.
Live Fire Moisture Database was demonstrated at the meeting.
The database is modeled after the existing Great Basin system.
This project is funded by NPSG and is being developed by
Chuck Bucher. The host site is not finalized, but options
include the Fire Lab and the Remote Sensing Application
Center (RSAC).
Training - Revisiting the need for a basic NFDRS Course,
to provide that basic level of knowledge in an automated
CD or webbased.
Fire/Air Issues Coordinating Group - Pete Lahm
Strategy for Engaging Fire in the Smoke Regulatory Process
There is a tightening of standards under the Clean Air Act.
A priority matrix is being developed to help engage the
fire program in the smoke regulatory process through the
utilization of a cadre of specialists.
A briefing paper will be developed for management to disseminate.
back to the top
Day Two – Wednesday, March 7, 2007
Interagency RAWS Network - Herb Arnold
There are 2400 stations in ASCADS, of which approximately
2000 are active. There are approximately 1600 stations that
maintain NFDRS Standards; which implies an active maintenance
program, not just having the equipment to measure the required
parameters. In addition there are the Portable/Fire RAWS
which use radio alerts to pass information to the Incident
Management Teams. In the future this information will pass
digitally.
NIFC provides:
- 95% Depot Service
- 25% Field Service - BLM and some BIA
- Dispatch Fire RAWS and Project RAWS
- BLM-IRM - 98% Telecom Support/ASCADS
- Interagency RAWS Partners Group -
Policy and Planning
RAWS data directly supports:
- Wildland Fire
- RX
- Fire Use
- NFDRS…
Future Development
Beginning April 1 the RSFWSU will function under a MEU as
part of the reorganization process. This transition should
be transparent to the data user.
Additional data quality/quantity requirements as a result
of the OFCM Fire Weather Survey
New Technology Influences
The question of how many RAWS are needed was generated
by budget/funding concerns. There was a perception that
the RAWS Network growth was perceived as uncontrolled. There
was no real study to determine fire weather needs.
RAWS network growth is a mix of local control using local
funding in the acquisition of RAWS to meet local needs and
central funding for RAWS maintenance.
Costs:
- 2200 stations x 12,000/station
= $24.6M
- Yearly (depot maintenance costs
- 2200 stations x 1100/year = $2.42M/year
- With field maintenance of $5-6
M /year
Fire RAWS
NIFC dispatches Fire RAWS to fire and all risk incidents.
There are 42 kits currently available with plans to increase
that to 50. The standards are being developed by the Fire
Weather Committee.
WIMS, Data Warehouse, WFAS - Mike Barrowcliff
and Larry Bradshaw
WIMS is currently being evaluated for a reengineering; budget
requests are proposed for 2009. This corresponds with the
refresh/reengineer proposal study for ASCADS. There is potential
for the two systems to be evaluated together.
A Task Group is being formed to look at all applications
that are managed under the Fire Danger Committee. Russ Gripp
is the Chair and he is still looking for participants.
WIMS is one of eight applications that is currently hosted
on FAMWEB via a webportal. Improved infrastructure for all
systems that are hosted at Kansas City will allow the hardware
platform to logically partition itself. An alternate “hotsite”
will be located in Beltsville, Maryland to allow for more
robust disaster recovery. The Data Warehouse will also be
incorporated into this system and will share COGNOS with
other systems at Kansas City.
FireFamilyPlus - Larry Bradshaw
Version 4 is still being tested. Larry will have a beta
version available at the 2nd Fire Behavior and Fuels Conference
in Destin, Florida.
ASCADS
The purpose of ASCADS is to download near realtime weather
observations from RAWS. It provides data. It is functional
but is becoming obsolete and there are plans to review the
system and funding for a refresh/reengineer. Some functionality
will be taken over by CMMS.
WFMI - Greg Jensen
WFMI is a suite of applications originally designed for
dispatchers and is hosted on a BLM Sponsored website which
includes the following program areas:
- Weather
- Display of where the stations
are located
- Metadata is available
- Capable of grouping stations
- Lighting
- Fire Reporting
- Aviation
The site is password protection because
of lightning data.
There is a Change Management Board that manages the applications
based on user requests.
Round Robin continued
Fire Occurrence Reporting System - Tom Wordell
The report was presented at the NFAEB Meeting with the understanding
that it will take time to process. The study revalidated
the need based on user requirements; it was not a design
or system proposal. The preliminary recommendation identified
38 critical elements. The report has not been released and
guidance will come from NFAEB regarding the release.
National Predictive Service Group - Tom Wordell
There are a few changes in the composition of the group:
Susie Stingley-Russell is the new Center Manager Representative
- vice Gerry Day
John Barborinas is the new Field Level Representative -
vice Chip Collins
Paul Witsamen is the National Weather Service Representative
vice Roger Lamoni
Tom Rolinski is the Geographic Area Meteorologist Representative
vice Chuck Maxwell
Sheldon Wimmer is the Geographic Operations Group Liaison
- Predictive Services Handbook - The
group is continuing to work on the Handbook which will
include the protocols and standards between GACCs for
staffing, funding and national level products.
- Funding - NFAEB is considering national
level funding for the program.
- Monthly and Seasonal Outlook - The
prototype will be available this month. The new format
includes input from climate forecasters. NICC assumes
the bulk of the responsibility in assembling the product.
A monthly assessment will be issued along with a forecast
for the nest three months. The prototype will rum in parallel
for the nest few months.
- NMAC After Action Review - The Team
met with Aaron Gelobter and Rex Mann from NIMO to address
issues that were revealed during the After Action Review.
NICC is working with NMAC to identify and fulfill the
requirements. There may be an impact at the GACC level
depending on the information requested and the timeframes
- COMET - Tim Spangler addressed the
group at the last meeting. Although NPSG does not have
the funds to contract with COMET, there may be segments
available that could be incorporated.
Fire Weather Committee - Robyn Heffernan
The group is just getting started and she is still filling
positions. There are currently two openings at the operation
level, which would ideally be filled with individuals for
the Bureau of Indian Affairs of the Fish and Wildlife Service.
Their first conference call will be next month and the first
meeting is scheduled for the third of forth week of May.
The Committee has responsibility for:
- RAWS
- Portable RAWS Stations Standards
- NFDRS Weather Standards - coordinate
with RAWS partners, filling that role in the meantime
- Advisory Group for a task the BLM
funds through the climate center to archive RAWS data
to be accessible and available - useful for the field,
convert into data that can be queried - climate product.
- Curriculum Matrix
Poster for the Fire Behavior and Fuels Conference was
presented. Suggestions and corrections need to be given
to Larry Bradshaw. He will make changes and send out another
draft next week.
The remainder of the day was devoted to working on Action
Items or analyzing and compiling results from the OFCM Survey.
back to the top
Day Three – Thursday, March 8,
FPA - Fire Program Analysis Project Overview -
Howard Roose
FPA is an interagency tool for program, planning and budgeting;
it provides information to be used to help make decisions
using simulations not optimizations.
A single system that will replace ones used by the five
federal wildland fire agencies
A tool to evaluate the effectiveness of different fire management
programs
A tool to provide greater accountability to the public
The greatest challenge is to find reliable data that all
parties agree upon and weather is a great part of it.
Design and build prototype model - by June 2007
System build and testing - June 2008
The analysis is based on Fire Planning Units (FPU); each
FPU requires a defined weather station that is representative
of the unit. Those stations were identified to the Western
Regional Climate Center. The weather data is then corrected.
The Forest Service is developing a plan to have the corrected
data reloaded into the corporate system. Additional data
requirements and corrections are still being discussed including
corrections to the BLM 1202 system. Target resolution is
at 30 meters.
The Historic Weather has undergone a quality control process
by the Western Regional Climate Center.
- Action Item: The
fate of that data set has not been determined and should
be something that FENWT considers.
www.wrc.dri.edu/fpa
Western Regional Climate Center - Kelly Redmond
RAWS are deployed more often to meet locally defined needs
rather then from centrally perceived and defined needs.
The incremental value of a station to a system is hard to
quantify. The biggest issue is how to appropriation the
costs when benefits are distributed. There may also be value
in including RAWS as a contributor to a network of networks
(ASOS, AWOS and SNOTEL). The totality of the issue needs
to be addressed. The Oklahoma Mesonet is an excellent example
of a fine scale network.
NOAA has determined that it id more economical to produce
high quality data at the start, rather than to correct the
data at later.
What is the possibility of the Climate Center performing
the functionality of ROMAN?
There does not seem to be a prohibition to this.
ROMAN caters to weather and the Climate Center caters to
climate. If all the data was at one place, both those purposes
could be provided at one place.
The needs to have the data accessed 24/7 would not to be
addressed; would just need to know what the requirements
are.
Risk Informed Decisions - John Szymoniak
- Weather/Climate data is major
component
- FSPro - Fire Spread Probability
- Rapid Response Decision Support
- A webbased system that provides the
probability of spread over a 14 day period graphically.
- Utilizes ERC from RAWS (and there
are never enough) and wind
- The process also functions as a way
to validate what is on 209’s
- The program does not currently address
public health, but it is planned
- This will be part of the required
process depending on cost estimates determined in the
WFSA
Round Robin Continued
Fire/Air Issues Coordinating Group - Pete Lahm (continued)
Exceptional Event Rule
There are six key components for public health that are
monitored as required by the Clean Air Act, including ozone,
carbon monoxide and PM25. Congress has introduced the Exceptional
Event Rule, which is expected to be released soon. Under
this rule, Wildland Fire Use as well as wildland fires is
considered a natural exceptional event. Under this rule
that data can be flagged as fire being a contributor and
the measurement will be waived in the determination of nonattainment.
How this rule will affect Prescribed Fire is yet to be determined.
It appears that the need to have a Certified Smoke Management
Program has been relaxed to Basic Smoke Practices. This
rule may also precipitate the need for additional data elements
and smoke monitoring capabilities.
Fire Behavior Committee - Larry VanBussum
IRPG - The IRPG updates were posted to MyFireCommunity for
comments. The Committee needs to know how to submit for
publication.
- Action:
Paul will provide template to Zeke
Maintenance Plan For Training - This spreadsheet that
lists courses that are maintained outside of the Training
Working Team is somewhat confusing in that it does not
list all the courses that the Fire Behavior Committee
has a role in. This is probably not an issue and discussions
are progressing with the Training Working Team and a liaison
from their team should be identified soon.
National Weather Service - Larry VanBussum
The National Weather Service has contracted with COMET to
produce Advanced Fire Weather Initiative S-591. This project
is expected to last through the first half of 2008. They
are proposing that COMET convert S-290, Intermediate Fire
Danger into a distance learning proposal. Preliminary discussions
have taken place with Deb Epps and Wendell Welch in Training.
The Weather Service views this as an opportunity to provide
training to all their fire meteorologists and as an opportunity
to expose the fire management agencies to the potential
and opportunities of using COMET courses.
- Action: Paul will
visit with Deb Epps and Wendell Welch to determine the
appropriate steps.
Request for Standards
NWCG, IOS and PMS have all requested FENWT identify the
standards and documents that they are responsible for.
- Action Item: Paul
will respond to the three requests.
Conference Calls
- April
- Jim O’Sullivan - NOAA MADIS and NERON
- May or June
back
to the top
back
to Minutes
|