Skip to main content

PMS 530-1

Aircraft

NWCG Committee Realignment Website Updates: Content will continue to be updated over the coming days as we work through final reviews and adjustments, and all publications and products are currently under revision.

Single Engine Airtanker (SEAT)

Aircraft | Contracts | Facilities | Maintenance | Operations | Personnel Contractors | Personnel Government


SYSTEM:  SEAT, Aircraft

Sub-System Hazards Pre-Mitigation Mitigation Post-Mitigation

Probability

Severity

Risk Level

Probability

Severity

Risk Level

Capabilities High density altitude affects the aircraft performance

Almost Certain

Critical

Extremely High

Assign appropriate SEAT aircraft for mission and typical DA. Conduct pre-mission performance planning. Reinforce high/hot/heavy training. Complete load calculation before flight.

Unlikely

Critical

Medium

Inappropriate aircraft for mission

Possible

Critical

High

Ensure SEAT is appropriate for temperatures, altitude, terrain, fuel type and mission. Receive feedback from pilots and aerial supervisor. If not effective, order different/additional aircraft.

Unlikely

Critical

Medium

Maintenance Mechanical failure

Possible

Catastrophic

Extremely High

Pilot and SEMG monitor maintenance schedule. Vendor follows maintenance/overhaul schedule. Pilot reviews and understands emergency procedures.

Unlikely

Critical

Medium

Aircraft improperly maintained

Possible

Catastrophic

Extremely High

Follow contract/FAA requirements and aircraft maintenance manual. Aircraft inspectors check that FAA maintenance requirements are met. Pilot performs/ensures that daily pre- and post-flight inspections are complete and that all life and time limit maintenance items are completed per maintenance manual.

Unlikely

Critical

Medium

Collision Avoidance Visibility

Almost Certain

Catastrophic

Extremely High

Keep windscreen clean. Aircraft will have high-visibility paint scheme. Pilot and ground resources must maintain situational awareness. Only fly during VFR conditions.

Unlikely

Critical

Medium

Un-used or inoperable high-visibility aircraft lighting systems

Possible

Critical

High

Landing and strobe lights need to be maintained and utilized as required by contract and aerial supervision guide. If lighting is inoperable, aircraft will return to base until repaired.

Unlikely

Critical

Medium

Congested airspace, military airspace, uncontrolled airports

Almost Certain

Catastrophic

Extremely High

Aircraft will have operable collision avoidance system (TCAS), rate-of-climb indicator, gyro, and aeronautical charts for area of operations. Pilot will review known aerial hazards prior to flight. Practice see and avoid.

Unlikely

Catastrophic

High

Aircraft Carding and Pilot Inspection Process Lack of standardization

Possible

Moderate

Medium

Ensure implementation of standardized SEAT aircraft and pilot inspection process. Train inspectors on new standards. Ensure SEMGs are knowledgeable on pre-use inspection process.

Unlikely

Moderate

Medium

Equipment Aviation maintenance inspectors unfamiliar with SEAT aircraft

Possible

Critical

High

Train and utilize more Interagency aviation maintenance inspectors (include all agencies) with past SEAT program experience and knowledge.

Unlikely

Critical

Medium

Locations of cockpit controls and switches not consistent/standardized

Possible

Moderate

Medium

Establish standard configuration in SEATs. Allow relief pilots time for orientation in each aircraft prior to mission operations.

Rare

Negligible

Low

Inadequate pre-flight/post-flight inspections

Possible

Critical

High

Agency reps and vendor personnel should ensure adequate revenue time for pre- and post-flight inspections. Document pre- and post-flight inspections daily.

Unlikely

Moderate

Medium

Communications Changing technology and lack of training

Likely

Critical

Extremely High

During the inspection and carding process ensure contractors (pilots) are skilled with equipment provided–GPS, VHF and UHF radios, AFF, etc.

Unlikely

Critical

Medium

Communication with non-federal fire departments - lack of radio equipment compatibility (narrow banding and frequencies)

Possible

Critical

High

Continue to work with state, city and county fire departments to meet future federal standards and compatibility issues. Work with national agency/interagency radio program leaders to ensure the policies they develop are compatible with aviation requirements.

Unlikely

Critical

Medium

Inadequate frequency management

Almost Certain

Catastrophic

Extremely High

Conduct effective air base in-briefings, including relief pilots. Ensure pilot has adequate time for orientation/programming before mission flights. Conduct frequent AARs and/or specialized training simulation exercises. Perform periodic reviews of frequency lists and avionics equipment operations. Check radio systems following days off. Ensure that positive communications are established.

Unlikely

Critical

Medium

No communications between SEAT pilot and ground/air ops

Possible

Catastrophic

Extremely High

Follow appropriate checklists and procedures. Do not drop on fire line unless sure area is clear of ground personnel. If no contact can be established on incident return to base.

Unlikely

Critical

Medium

Radio frequency congestion

Almost Certain

Critical

Extremely High

Make alternative frequencies readily available and known. Order additional frequencies as needed. Utilize AFF when possible to reduce congestion. Maintain effective working relationships with frequency coordinators. During high-fire activity consider ordering standalone frequency coordinator.

Unlikely

Critical

Medium

Lack of flight following frequencies

Likely

Critical

Extremely High

Request local flight following frequencies whenever possible. Utilize standardized AFF procedures. Utilize national flight following if necessary. Utilize Air Guard as a last resort for initial contact for flight following.

Unlikely

Critical

Medium

 

Download the Word version (docx) of this information and the Risk Assessment Matrix (pdf) to use with the Risk Assessment Worksheet (docx).

 

 

Last Modified / Reviewed:

NWCG Latest Announcements

LMC Equipment Bulletin 26-001: Aquatic Invasive Species – Seasonal Reminder for Mussels

Date:  July 30, 2026
Questions? 
Please contact: Equipment and Technology Subcommittee

The Logistics and Equipment Management Committee (LMC) issued Equipment Bulletin 26-001: Aquatic Invasive Species - Seasonal Reminder for Mussels, reminding the wildland fire community that aquatic mussels continue to be a problem. Mussels rapidly colonize hard and soft surfaces, including aquatic plants and fire equipment, clogging pipes, fouling motors, disrupting water systems, and impacting native species.

To help prevent their spread, fire personnel must follow the decontamination procedures outlined in the NWCG Guide to Preventing Aquatic Invasive Species Transport by Wildland Fire Operations, PMS 444. Additionally, report any sightings immediately to your Lead Resource Advisor and include clear, close-up photos (with a pen or your hand for size reference) and location details.”

Read the complete LMC Equipment Bulletin 26-001, to learn more. 

References:

NWCG Alerts

LMC Equipment Bulletin 26-001: Aquatic Invasive Species - Seasonal Reminder for Mussels

NWCG Guide to Preventing Aquatic Invasive Species Transport by Wildland Fire Operations, PMS 444

Intermediate Faller (FAL2) Position Task Book Update

Date:  July 24, 2026
Questions? 
Please contact: Tree Felling Subcommittee

NWCG Operations Management Committee (OMC) has issued an update to the NWCG Position Task Book for Intermediate Faller (FAL2), PMS 311-91. To ensure clarity for both trainees and evaluators, the updated FAL2 Position Task Book (PTB) explicitly states who is authorized to sign off on your tasks:

“Evaluators must be qualified as a FAL2, or an Advanced Faller (FAL1).”

If you are currently working out of a previously published version of the FAL2 PTB, you do not need to restart. However, OMC highly encourages you to take the following step to prevent any confusion in the field:

  • Print and replace the updated evaluator information page (page 2) in your current physical PTB.

References:

Intermediate Faller (FAL2) Position Page

RMC Memo 26-01: Transition Plan for Implementing Updates to Intermediate Faller (FAL2) Position Qualifications

NWCG Position Task Book for Intermediate Faller (FAL2), PMS 311-91

Equipment Advisory 26-001: Potential Front Driveline Joint Failure on 2018 and Earlier Ram Pickups

Date:  July 10, 2026
Questions? 
Please contact: Equipment and Technology Subcommittee

The Logistics/Equipment Management Committee (LMC) has released Equipment Advisory 26-001: Potential Front Driveline Joint Failure on 2018 and Earlier Ram Pickups. This advisory highlights multiple U.S. Forest Service regions reporting front driveline joint failure incidents.

This advisory recommends firefighters and fire managers to: 

  • Follow all Ram-issued inspection, maintenance, and service guidance for front driveline joints. 
  • Consider installing a driveline loop. 
  • Coordinate with fleet managers and service providers to determine the most appropriate driveline loop kit for each pickup.

For further details, please refer to the complete advisory.

References:

Equipment Advisory 26-001: Potential Front Driveline Joint Failure on 2018 and Earlier Ram Pickups

Technical Service Bulletin: 03-002-21

NEW! NWCG Standard Operating Procedures, PMS 900

Date:  July 9, 2026
Questions? 
Please contact: NWCG Staff

NWCG is excited to announce the publication of the NWCG Standard Operating Procedures, PMS 900.

The new publication establishes general, consistent, and uniform standards for conducting business with the National Wildfire Coordinating Group.

References:

NWCG Standard Operating Procedures, PMS 900